Formally we reject the null hypothesis.
( null hypotheses)
Type I error: The null hypothesis is rejected when it is true.
The inferential statistics do not directly address the testable statement (research hypothesis). They address the . Statistically, we test "not." Here are the null hypotheses:
the opposite of the research hypothesis. The null hypothesis states that any effects observed after treatment (or associated with a predictor variable) are due to chance alone. Statistically, the question that is being answered is "If these samples came from the same population with regard to the outcome, how likely is the obtained result?"
Type II error: The null hypothesis is not rejected when it is false.
On the other hand, the null hypothesis is straightforward  what is the probability that our treated and untreated samples are from the same population (that the treatment or predictor has no effect)? There is only one set of statistical probabilities  calculation of chance effects. Instead of directly testing H, we test H. If we can reject H, (and factors are under control), we can accept H. To put it another way, the fate of the research hypothesis depends upon what happens to H.
The null hypothesis is usually an hypothesis of "no difference" e.g. no difference between blood pressures in group A and group B. Define a null hypothesis for each study question clearly before the start of your study.
They make it easier to reject null hypotheses.
The first step in hypothesis testing is to set a research hypothesis. In Sarah and Mike's study, the aim is to examine the effect that two different teaching methods – providing both lectures and seminar classes (Sarah), and providing lectures by themselves (Mike) – had on the performance of Sarah's 50 students and Mike's 50 students. More specifically, they want to determine whether performance is different between the two different teaching methods. Whilst Mike is skeptical about the effectiveness of seminars, Sarah clearly believes that giving seminars in addition to lectures helps her students do better than those in Mike's class. This leads to the following research hypothesis:
The criterion will let us conclude whether (reject null hypothesis) or not (accept null hypothesis) the treatment (prenatal alcohol) has an effect (on birth weight).
How to Set Up a Hypothesis Test: Null versus Alternative

All null hypotheses include an equal sign in them.
Why the Null Hypothesis (H)?

Null Hypothesis: Definition  Statistics and Probability
In the second step of the procedure we identify the kind of data that is expected if the null hypothesis is true.

Learn About Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis
Specifically, we identify the mean we expect if the null hypothesis is true.
Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis."
For our example, we formally state: The alternative hypothesis (H1) is that prenatal exposure to alcohol has an effect on the birth weight for the population of lab rats.
Null Hypothesis Definition  Investopedia
The Pvalue approach involves determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability — assuming the null hypothesis were true — of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed. If the Pvalue is small, say less than (or equal to) α, then it is "unlikely." And, if the Pvalue is large, say more than α, then it is "likely."
Statistical hypothesis tests define a procedure ..
If the Pvalue is less than (or equal to) α, then the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. And, if the Pvalue is greater than α, then the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Null Hypothesis  Definition of Null Hypothesis by …
When we pose a research question, we want to know whether the outcome is due to the treatment (independent variable) or due to chance (in which case our treatment is probably not effective). For example, the claim that tutoring improves math performance generally does not predict exactly how much improvement. Each level of improvement has a different probability associated with it, and it would take a long time and a great deal of effort to specify the probability of each of the possible outcomes that would support our research hypothesis.
Null hypothesis  Define Null hypothesis at …
It is worth noting that these choices will sometimes be personal choices (i.e., they are subjective) and at other times they will be guided by some other/external information. For example, if you were to measure intelligence, there may be a number of characteristics that you could use, such as IQ, emotional intelligence, and so forth. What you choose here will likely be a personal choice because all these variables are proxies for intelligence; that is, they are variables used to infer an individual's intelligence, but not everyone would agree that IQ alone is an accurate measure of intelligence. In contrast, if you were measuring company performance, you would find a number of established metrics in the academic and practitioner literature that would determine what you should test, such as "Return on Assets", etc. Therefore, to know what you should measure, it is always worth looking at the literature first to see what other studies have done, whether you use the same measures or not. It is then a matter of making an educated decision whether the variables you choose to examine are accurate proxies for what you are trying to study, as well as discussing the potential limitations of these proxies.
Alternative hypothesis  Define Alternative hypothesis …
The alternative hypothesis (H_{1}) is the opposite of the null hypothesis; in plain language terms this is usually the hypothesis you set out to investigate. For example, question is "is there a significant (not due to chance) difference in blood pressures between groups A and B if we give group A the test drug and group B a sugar pill?" and alternative hypothesis is " there is a difference in blood pressures between groups A and B if we give group A the test drug and group B a sugar pill".